How FrameThrower compares
One page per tool, each saying what the other product is genuinely better at and when to pick it instead. Every description of another product is quoted from how they describe themselves, with the date it was read.
That is not diplomacy. These pages get read by people who will open the other tab, and by machines that will also read the other side — a comparison that overstates is worth less than no comparison at all. If anything here is wrong or out of date, tell us and it gets corrected.
FrameThrower vs Frameset
A clean, well-organised stills database with its own comparison pages that are genuinely useful reading
FrameThrower vs frmz
The canvas-first approach is the right instinct
FrameThrower vs ShotBook
Video, not stills
FrameThrower vs MovieStillsDB
By far the largest archive of official publicity material, and the right place to go for it
FrameThrower vs StillsLab
Covers TV as well as film, which several stills libraries skip entirely
FrameThrower vs shot.cafe
Free, fast and tag-based, with detailed shot tags
FrameThrower vs EyeCandy
Organised around technique as the primary axis
Longer comparisons
These three have their own pages rather than a /vs entry — one page per competitor, not two competing for the same question.
Try it before you compare
$2 of credits free on signup, no card. Search 5,489 films by lighting, lens, colour and mood.
Sign up for freeMore: the stills database · film lookbooks · colour palettes